In a recent blog post from Bas Dijkstra, he metaphorically equates test automation to bubble wrap in “an attempt to help people see test automation in a slightly different light than the ‘be all end all’ solution to all testing problems that it’s still perceived as too often.” While I suggest you check out his article, here’s a quick summary:
The above analogizes bubble wrap to test automation, ultimately making a case for the appropriate - and not superfluous or unnecessary - use of test automation.
Bas also uses an excellent example shared by Alex Schladebeck regarding the importance of exploratory testing alongside automated testing:
Say you’re going for a run in the park. You may make a list of everything to watch out for (i.e. weather, other people, the potential for injury), but it happens that there is a dangerous animal in the park that you didn’t account for in your list. This is a clear example of when exploratory testing can be incredibly useful.
Both forms of testing are important in forming a comprehensive testing suite. But where does one end and the other begin?
How do you balance the two forms of testing?
Going beyond software Customers come to test IO for many different reasons. Sometimes, an internal product or QA team needs a force multiplier for real-world testing – to extend the existing QA team’s processes and activities beyond their internal team. Other times, it’s crisis mode – perhaps QA leadership has left the company, or there is a critical product release upcoming that […]
Here's our guide to which method you should use you to distribute your IOS app to the crowd.
Exploratory testing emphasizes creativity and learning. Test Case testing emphasizes planning and execution. Which one is right for you?
